隨著比特幣序號迅速接近 5000 萬登記里程碑，比特幣社區(qū)準備慶祝自 Casey

于 1 月 30 日

新協(xié)議以加密每個聰中的數(shù)字內(nèi)容以來的一周年。

在這次慶?；顒又?，12 月 14 日，羅達莫 (Rodarmor) 使用他的協(xié)議創(chuàng)建并銘刻了有史以來第一個序號。

這是比特幣區(qū)塊鏈上黑白骷髏的原始像素藝術(shù)，他將其分配為數(shù)字零。

Rodarmor 的

在 Twitter 上自稱

上

“99% 的序號都是騙局。

另外1%也是騙局?！?/p>

據(jù)一位匿名的

組成

“說實話。

Web3 受到數(shù)字萬金油和 JPG 銷售人員的困擾，但我們不要忘記中本聰在比特幣網(wǎng)絡(luò)的創(chuàng)世區(qū)塊中留下了一條隱藏信息，可能暗示其

雙重用途，

”消息人士稱。

“這個系列的

與眾不同之處

在于，它引用了中本聰譴責法定貨幣腐敗的原始信息，因此它將比特幣愛好者和 Maxis 聯(lián)系在一起。

此外，它表明藝術(shù)可以提升比特幣并幫助其達到新的領(lǐng)域，”假冒文化集體消息人士補充道。

消息人士在獨家采訪中表示：“與 Ordinals 不同，比特幣 maxis 只需要仔細研究這些類型的項目，就能意識到銘文的威力有多大?！?

“得益于 Casey Rodarmor 的序數(shù)協(xié)議，比特幣是藝術(shù)可以無限（或永久）安全存在的地方?！?/p>

作為 Ordinal 用例并利用其永久優(yōu)點的一個例子，斯巴達克斯項目于 2023 年 10 月 7 日使用 Ordinal 協(xié)議將朱利安·阿桑奇 (Julian Assange) 的維基解密在 2010 年公布的大量阿富汗戰(zhàn)爭日志記錄在比特幣上。

Project Spartacus has a website where it provides a public interface allowing users to inscribe a war log on the Bitcoin blockchain.

Reigniting the block size war

The emergence of Bitcoin Ordinals revived the “Blocksize Wars” of 2015 to 2017, a period marked by rancor and internal division. It split the Bitcoiners in two, those advocating for large blocks and those in favour of small blocks.

That lead to a Bitcoin fork that enabled Bitcoin Cash’s inception in August 2017. BCH was subject to another forkwar —which all bitcoiners are trying to avoid — that lead to the emergence of Bitcoin Satoshi’s Vision (BSV).

Those who identify as Maxis claim that Ordinals are filling block transactions with “spam” and other “digital garbage,” while causing fees to increase. The Ordinals supporters claim that increasing the blocksize and adding utility, including Ordinal inscriptions, will bring more people to Bitcoin.

@DecredSociety wrote on Twitter that “Bitcoin is experiencing a spam attack, blocks are filling up fast with internet goods including jpegs. This development has been enabled by segwit, a soft fork that inflates the maximum block size of 1mb to 4mb.”

Creating a good fungible token protocol for Bitcoin

Addressing some of the Bitcoin maxis’ greater concerns over Ordinals, Rodarmor released Runes, enabling holding token balances in UTXOs and allowing for more flexible transactions.

In a blog explaining Runes, Rodarmor himself casts significant doubt on his creation.

“I'm not sure creating a new fungible token protocol for Bitcoin is a good idea. Fungible tokens are 99.9% scams and memes. However, they don't appear to be going away any time soon, similar to the way in which casinos don't appear to be going away any time soon,” he wrote.

However, Rodarmor assured that “creating a good fungible token protocol for Bitcoin could bring significant transaction fee revenue, developer mindshare, and users to Bitcoin.”

Expressing artists’ personal beliefs

“I am a strong believer that the short-term pain is great for the long-term growth of the Bitcoin ecosystem, which makes people think about what type of Ordinal Protocol code is needed in ScriptSig or how to implement computation functionalities using off-chain infrastructures, such as W3bstream.com,” IoTeX CEO Raullen Chai said.

Chai referenced a Bitcoin Forum thread by Seburnir in which Satoshi weighed in on 28 January 2010. “From his replies, one can clearly tell Satoshi is interested in exploring various Bitcoin chain use cases.

“The Bitcoin Ordinals are seen as a form of resistance to the traditional financial system,” Chai said regarding the Inflation collection. “They are also a way of expressing artists personal beliefs about Bitcoin and its potential to change the world. Sort of Bitcoin Fundamentalism.”

The world's most secure open-source network

Renewablox COO Jason Deane, a long-time, large-scale Bitcoin miner, believes that

“what we think or feel about Ordinals is entirely irrelevant. The Bitcoin network is a permissionless, open-source network, and like free speech, whether we agree or not, people can do what they like with it.”

“The key point is that Ordinals don't affect Bitcoin’s ability to work as a ‘store of value’ (some would probably even argue it actually helps this part of the use case) or as a unit of account,” Deane said.

He also had his sayso regarding Ordinals:

“The content is largely irrelevant. This is about whether the world's most secure open-source network powering the world's hardest money should be mucking about with monkey pictures.”

Do NFTs on the Bitcoin network enable Satoshi’s original mission? Likely not. But maybe that’s not the question we should be asking. Just as fundamentalists in all religions can cling overzealously to the literal words of their founding documents, perhaps many of us––Maxi or not—have stuck too closely to the words in the Bitcoin whitepaper and lost sight of the original ideals.

When asked specifically about the “Inflation” inscriptions found on Ord.io, which are full of symbolism and openly reject the establishment and its detrimental control over money, Deane responded that

“while the content or subject matter may have some very minor leverage at persuading a certain number of people who claim to be Bitcoin purists to look upon them more favourably, the overriding feeling will be more likely defined by the whether you are for or against the concept of them being there in the first place.”

L. Asher Corson, a Bitcoin Maximalist and a UTXO Management partner, recently wrote an Op-Ed in which he says he loves Ordinals. “Other Maximalists should also consider loving Ordinals, as they demonstrate Bitcoin's superiority in ways not previously possible,” he added.

Corson said Bitcoin Maxis understand there are no serious bitcoin contenders, nor will there ever be.

“Ordinals have the potential to enable use cases to be built natively on Bitcoin,” which would bring new users to the number one cryptocurrency.

Considerable debate

Bitcoiner and Commerce Block CEO Gregory Nicholas agrees that Ordinals has sparked considerable debate among long-time Bitcoin enthusiasts. “The question of what constitutes spam on the Bitcoin network is as old as Bitcoin itself.”

“Any efforts by Bitcoin maximalists or OGs to halt inscriptions would be futile and contradictory to Bitcoin's core permissionlessness and resistance to censorship principles,” Nicholas said.

他解釋說，“人們對在公共區(qū)塊鏈上嵌入銘文或元數(shù)據(jù)有著與生俱來的興趣，尤其是像比特幣這樣最強大、最廣泛的區(qū)塊鏈。

這種趨勢可以與人們愿意為實物黃金和白銀的定制設(shè)計支付的高額溢價進行比較?！?/p>

如果比特幣作為交換媒介取得廣泛成功，銘文市場自然會找到平衡。

他總結(jié)道，這些銘文的成本可能會變得相當小眾且昂貴，這反映了它們在比特幣生態(tài)系統(tǒng)中的獨特價值。

銘文和序號進入第一年，有更大的增長和發(fā)展?jié)摿?，包括比特幣的采用?/p>

Galaxy Research 的一份

即使報告的預(yù)測接近實現(xiàn)，也將不再有任何爭論的理由。

免責聲明：本文僅供參考。

它不提供或旨在用作法律、稅務(wù)、投資、財務(wù)或其他建議。

熱點：艾略特